Who Dislikes Whom? Affective Polarization between Pairs of Parties in Western Democracies
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract While dislike of opposing parties, that is, affective polarization, is a defining feature contemporary politics, research on this topic largely centers the United States. We introduce an approach analyzes polarization between pairs bridging US two-party system and multiparty systems in other democracies. Analyzing survey data from twenty Western democracies since mid-1990s, first, we show partisans' out-parties linked to elite policy disagreements economic issues and, increasingly over time, also cultural issues. Secondly, argue empirically demonstrate governing coalition partners parliamentary display much warmer feelings toward each than would expect based (dis)agreements. Third, radical right parties are disliked more intensely disputes arrangements. These findings highlight policy-based institutional underpinnings polarization.
منابع مشابه
On Self-selected Pairing in Cs1: Who Pairs with Whom?*
In recent years, we have seen an increased use of pair programming in CS-1 courses. Widespread evidence shows pair programming as beneficial at all levels of programming skill. During three academic years, we studied what students in CS-1 choose when given the option to either pair program or to program independently. We explore which students choose to pair and how often, and examine the major...
متن کاملWho Do European Parties Represent? How Western European Parties Represent the Policy Preferences of Opinion Leaders
Several recent studies explore how American politicians represent the policy views of subconstituencies within the electorate. We extend this perspective to 12 West European democracies over the period 1973–2002 to examine how mainstream parties responded to electoral subconstituencies. We find that parties were highly responsive to the views of opinion leaders, i.e., citizens who regularly eng...
متن کاملParties in Government: Incumbency and Representation in Parliamentary Democracies
[150 words] In spite of electoral change since the 1990s, party composition of government changes less and established parties stay in office longer than others regardless their electoral fortunes. This development is conducive to incongruence between the changing pattern of parties represented in parliament and those getting into government. It is argued that office seeking behaviour has becom...
متن کاملParties in Government: Incumbency and Representation in Parliamentary Democracies
[150 words] In spite of electoral change since the 1990s, party composition of government changes less and established parties stay in office longer than others regardless their electoral fortunes. This development is conducive to incongruence between the changing pattern of parties represented in parliament and those getting into government. It is argued that office seeking behaviour has becom...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: British Journal of Political Science
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['0007-1234', '1469-2112']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123422000394